Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paul_philp who wrote (67474)	1/21/2003 2:27:18 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

Well said Paul and Ditto. Scott never replies to the criticism. He just posts his agenda thru the words of others with disclaimers but without explanation of just what those disclaimers are. mike

To: paul_philp who wrote (67474)	1/21/2003 2:34:27 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The absurdity of some of the pieces Scott posts in the name of alternative points-of-view, deserved demonstration. Well, just to get back into combat mode here, the Herman piece hardly matched a rather regular round of off the wall stuff we get from the further right. But I can support a thread policy that all views, so long as they are stated in a civil manner, can and should be posted. Or else, we have to start fine tuning which essays are acceptable. Bottom line. Ken does a good job of walking the fence line on what's acceptable and what's not. I disagree with some of his cut points but (a) it's his forum not mine and (b) it works.