Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (67736)	1/22/2003 4:07:23 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

You are quite welcome. It was unavoidable, we had to make a good faith effort to deal with the UN. If I am correct, I anticipate there being much more intelligence than is imagined on Iraqi activity, and that should provide the basis for "calling the question".......

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (67736)	1/22/2003 4:11:12 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Nadine, I hope Bush has something up his sleeve. The folks on this thread who oppose american action keep calling for evidence of saddams perfidy. Come January 27, it would be a good thing to see Adlai Stevenson back at the UN, shouting at the iraqi ambassador. "Dont wait for the translation Mr.Hussein, just answer the question--Yes or No. I tried to defend the lack of discovery of wmd with Noel. I am having a hard time believing myself that nothing has been found. I know the inspectors are there to verify destruction of actual weapons but the world doesnt buy this argument--the world has fallen victim to the propagandists of the left and the "big lie". I cant believe reasonable people think saddam just up and destroyed this stuff and didnt take the time to even authenticate it for the UN. What a guy. mike