Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (4002)	1/22/2003 6:15:12 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7720

As long as you accept the inherent danger, as I discussed before, of women trying to turn consensual sexual interactions into rapes in order to secure the right to an abortion. I would think that, to claim the rape exemption, the woman would have had to have reported the rape and given physical evidence at the time it occurred. She couldn't just say she was raped after she discovered she was pregnant. I think your speculation is about a scenario that is moot. An unreported rape would be considered to be consensual. More on point, speculation about what this legislation would do to reports of rape. Would women be standing in line every Saturday night to report rapes on the off chance that they might have become pregnant during an impulsive moment? Would we need more police and more jails?