Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (4022)	1/22/2003 7:18:00 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

this is at least one example of an argument for treating unborn children that are the result of rape differently then other fetuses I follow that argument. And I follow Neo's argument for treating rape differently. They're both pragmatic and sensible. What I'm having trouble with is finding them compatible with the principle that a fetus is a person with rights. I don't see how the slave argument obviates the personhood of the fetus. Or trumps it, for that matter, except as a political expedient.