SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (31606)1/23/2003 8:51:59 AM
From: alanrs  Respond to of 196584
 
CNBC-actually the guy from the WSJ on at that hour-mentioned qcom having done well about 5:40 AM EST. I'm not clear why this is particularly important one way or the other.

ARS



To: Jim Mullens who wrote (31606)1/23/2003 9:15:14 AM
From: Mark Fleming  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 196584
 
Does someone have the email address of the appropriate person at CNBC we can send a message to regarding their constant omission of coverage of positive earnings announcements?



To: Jim Mullens who wrote (31606)1/23/2003 10:01:58 AM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 196584
 
CNBC gave no numbers on percentage growth in revenues or earnings, which of course is one of the strong points of the QCOM financial report. Comparing QCOM and NOK by referring only to the extent to which earnings exceeded estimates does not really give a good picture of what is going on.

Art


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News