SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: aladin who wrote (67975)1/23/2003 10:56:34 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
John,
Its easy to say democracy is desirable but its not always attainable and sometimes in order to satisfy national interest concens, one has to be realistic. Iraq is certainly about WMDs in saddams hands that will give him leverage over the reason and over us. It is also about oil. This is the reality. Of course if we could convert Iraq to democracy this would be a long term positive development but conversion to democracy for them might be almost as difficult as conversion to christianity, not to mention judaism. Remember in college when you wanted to take an elective but there was always a damned prerequisite you had to take. There may some of that that needs to go on first whether we like it or not. Most of asia that is now democratic evolved that way. India is a notable exception. Enough the rant. Mike



To: aladin who wrote (67975)1/23/2003 10:59:28 AM
From: Noel de Leon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Thats why its ok for the Brits, French and now even the Russians to have nukes. Democracies don't attack each other ...."
Does that mean you are in favor of removing WMDs from China, India, Pakistan, Israel, and North Korea?

"WMD is a smokescreen -...." yes, a smoke screen to gain control of oil.