SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kirk © who wrote (8171)1/23/2003 1:23:01 PM
From: Alastair McIntosh  Respond to of 95738
 
FWIW CSFB states the that current bonder uptick is being driven by a better yield curve producing more “good die” from existing 0.13 capacity.

F1Q rev and bookings higher. KLIC reported F1Q revenue and operating EPS of $111 mn and $(0.31); revenue declined 9% vs. F4Q but was above our estimates of $100 mn and $(0.43), guidance of $95-105 mn, and street at $100 mn and $(0.44). Leveraged to ASE Test, equipment sales (40% F1Q rev.) held up better than expected, declining 2% seq to $45 mn vs. our estimate of $34 mn. Pricing still an issue on Maxum, but fixed asset reductions drove 170bp seq. higher GM of 24.5%. We expected an upward bias to our F1Q bookings estimate of $100 mn; KLIC posted bookings of $117 mn, representing 6% seq. growth.

Bonder sales helping business. KLIC expects F2Q revenue of $120-130 mn, implying 8-17% seq. growth, with B:B of >=1.0. We believe current bonder uptick is being driven by a better yield curve producing more “good die” from existing 0.13 capacity. While encouraged by stabilizing trends at KLIC, we believe end demand is still the key issue, and will be needed to sustain positive order momentum past the Mar Q. Importantly, while KLIC is often used as a leading indicator for SCE, upside should not be viewed as a clear path for growth for the rest of the industry. Unit plays should continue to outperform capacity plays until utilization rates in the wafer fabs increase and pricing environment improves - an unlikely event in 1H03.

New estimates. KLIC is doing a good job controlling what it can. Better cost leverage is evident with $9 mn in recurring opex removed over the past 2 qtrs. Based on company’s higher revenue outlook and solid cost discipline, we are increasing our F03 estimates of $450 mn and $(1.25) to $512 mn and $(0.65); Street consensus is $(1.12). Breakeven is pulled-in 1-qtr to F4Q at $140 mn rev., though could be optimistic given difficult pricing climate. F04 estimates are introduced at $651 mn and $0.56.

Discounted valuation but real profitability issues linger. At 1.0 times FTM sales stock trades at a significant discount to SCE average of 2.4 times, allowing stock could benefit near term from a more optimistic outlook in F2Q02. We remain cautious longer term with pricing difficulties likely to dampen margin and profitability leverage and with cash expected to drift lower in the near term. PT raised from $5 to $6 reflecting mildly better outlook and visibility though lack of earnings should limit upside.



To: Kirk © who wrote (8171)1/23/2003 2:40:15 PM
From: Cary Salsberg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95738
 
A customer quote from a news release about the sale of Maxxams.

ASE Vice President of Operations T.S. Chen commented, "We are pleased with the performance of the Maxum ball bonders for ultra-fine-pitch, high-lead-count semiconductor packages. These bonders will supplement those already in operation and will be used for ball grid array (BGA) packages and other devices requiring leading edge capabilities."



To: Kirk © who wrote (8171)1/28/2003 4:13:45 PM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95738
 
I don't think we resolved my question: Were the KLIC higher orders for technology or capacity?

I wrote:

>>I believe this is a technology issue, not a capacity issue. I think I remember reading that the new Maxxam bonder is needed for more advanced chips.

>That would make sense. For a wirebonder, I think the only technology upgrades besides productivity would be finer pitch, higher quality, bigger chips or different metals. Have I missed some?

This page kns.com
seems to indicate that the old bonder would do 45um bonds but users get higher productivity with the "Maxum IC Ball Bonder".

So, that says to me that buyers are adding capacity unless all of a sudden some major users are going to larger chips.


Now if I look at Gallery charts of two back end wafer fab companies I track, KLIC and UTEK, then they both seem to be showing some relative strength, UTEK especially:

stockcharts.com|B

Didn't TSMC's Morris Chang pretty much say he expected higher shipments soon and his capital equipment budget has a higher upper end than people were predicting just a week ago?

Kirk