Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (346910)	1/23/2003 5:38:11 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769667

Do you take her alibi at face value? She's admitted to going behind JLA's back to SI. Do you think she didn't check that thread to see if the offending posts were removed after she made her complaints? Why did she leave all those guys twisting as the accused? Why didn't she go there after she admitted her duplicity and apologize to Ray, PartyTime and all the others for putting them in the role of falsely accused? Is this the behavior of someone whose word you can trust?

To: Neocon who wrote (346910)	1/23/2003 5:59:21 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Absolutely- very fair I understand the "resolve it among yourselves thing"- and I never complain about things said about me- even very personal insults that have been directed at me and my family. That's a personal thing. But this, imo, is different. And it doesn't matter about the response, it was worth it to do what I thought was right. If I hadn't thought it was right I wouldn't have done it. If something is worth doing, there are no reasons to have regrets. You do what you need to do, and things fall into place. I live my life that way, and good things always happen.

To: Neocon who wrote (346910)	1/23/2003 11:57:08 PM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

were not going out of your way to cause trouble, but reacting spontaneously to a series of offensive posts Neo, what can you be thinking? do you really think, knowing and reading her that she did not go out of her way to cause trouble specifically for JLA? offensive posts bother her!?! she is the queen of offensive posts, insults and name calling what do you think the "Princess" name she called JLA over at sharks implied? any gay/queer undertone? and I know you can't believe for one second, knowing JLA as well as you do, that his "saddambuttkissing peace queers" has anything to do with hate speak towards gays as a group - but only reactionary and angry posts to a slew goading posts made to a veteran have you ever seen him posts racial slurs or attack any minority groups? why do you think she came over here? could she have carried an agenda with her after JLA left sharks and the thread, her favorite thread, went dead? I know you're a 'lets play nice children' kind of guy but sometimes Neo, you have to open your eyes get down off the fence and get a little dirty