Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (347227)	1/24/2003 11:29:13 AM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I think you're wrong first you have no idea how many times she had reported posts and posters to SI, other than she has admitted she does in fact do that we know about this one cause action was taken so we don't know how may times she resorts to this tactic saying JLA 'could' get in trouble with SI administration on a monthly or weekly basis is a blanket statement Neo - frank hard edged posting does not constitute TOU violations if you agree JLA did not mean to slander gays if you agree the use of 'Princess' by X is questionable regarding gay under tones if you agree she dishes it out, hence does the exact same thing she report JLA of doing how can you say you believe she found this to be unusually offensive? how can you not think it wasn't a personal vendetta?