Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorne who wrote (2759)	1/25/2003 12:34:36 PM
From: lorne	Respond to of 15987

More Americans support 'going it alone' Approval rating for U.N. lower than that for Bush January 25, 2003 As suspense builds for Monday's much hyped status report by the United Nations weapons inspectors in Iraq, a new poll shows more Americans support the United States "going it alone" in taking military action to remove Saddam Hussein from power. A poll conducted by Scott Rasmussen Public Opinion Research found 46 percent of Americans in favor of taking action without U.N. backing. Only 36 percent said it would be better to cooperate with U.S. allies and leave Hussein in power. The data are from a national telephone survey of 1,000 adults conducted Jan. 22 - 23. The margin of error for the full sample is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95 percent level of confidence. Rasmussen's data also suggest U.N. inspections have convinced more Americans that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. Seventy-five percent now believe that Saddam Hussein has nuclear or biological weapons. That figure is up from 69 percent earlier in the month. Only 8 percent think Hussein is telling the truth in declaring he has no such weapons. At the same time, Rasmussen's poll found that 48 percent hold a favorable opinion of the U.N. Thirty-one percent have an unfavorable opinion and 21 percent are not sure. By comparison, polls show more Americans hold a favorable opinion of President Bush's performance. A Fox News poll conducted last week showed the president's job approval rating down slightly, to 63 percent. A CNN-USA Today-Gallup poll had the rating down to 58 percent last week. This marked the first time Bush's approval rating had dropped below 60 percent since before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Earlier survey results found Americans overwhelmingly prefer to act with the support of allies, when given the choice. But developments this week make the choice of taking military action in the immediate future with the blessing of the U.N. Security Council appear less likely. France, Germany, Russia and China have expressed opposition to "rushing" into war and call for giving inspections more time. In his daily White House briefing, spokesman Ari Fleischer acknowledged the mounting antiwar sentiment but emphasized allies, including Britain, Australia, Italy, Spain and "virtually all of the eastern European countries," would back U.S. action. Such support appears to be enough for Bush administration officials to run with. Citing authoritative sources in Washington and London, The Guardian reports that war with Iraq will be a reality within weeks. President Bush is expected to "turn up the heat" in his annual State of the Union address Tuesday, the day after the U.N. inspectors' report. Fox News reports Secretary of State Colin Powell and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld briefed some 50 senators on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and and ties to al-Qaida in a closed-door session yesterday. As WorldNetDaily reported last month, wide majorities of Americans believe Hussein will become more dangerous if the U.S. does not take military action to disarm him. A Rasmussen poll found 63 percent of adults believe military action is needed sooner rather than later to ensure that Saddam does not become more powerful. worldnetdaily.com

To: lorne who wrote (2759)	1/25/2003 4:42:25 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15987

Wonder if they also have a religious obligation to build nuclear powered aircraft carriers? NPR just rebroadcast something they recorded last year aboard the USS Stennis - an interview with various of the 5000 people who work on it. One woman, for example, works 12 hours a day just refilling vending machines. Snickers are the most popular snacks, some fruit chew (Boomers? anyway never heard of it) the least. Until hearing it, it never really crossed my mind to wonder what it takes to keep 5000 people taken care of for six months at sea. Naturally, there are radar units, weather units, intelligence units, and all the other things you'd think of, but all food, fresh water, etc., must be provided from elsewhere. And on an aircraft carrier, you rarely get to go up on the deck, unless it's part of your job. After all, that's where the planes take off and land. Having nuclear weapons requires more than religion. You need lots of engineers, factories, and a lot of other technology and discipline that are inconsistent with the backwardness that currently plagues much of the Middle East. Missiles. Aircraft. Mechanics. Repairmen. Air conditioned clean rooms for supercomputers. Unless, of course, they mean that they will just buy one that somebody else made. Sort of like going to flight school but not learning how to take off or land. I am firmly convinced that if they acquire the technology and education to build their own, it will require them to change for the better, so my feelings are mixed.