Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (348432)	1/27/2003 4:00:25 PM
From: JakeStraw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

What more is there to know except chicks like it! :^)

To: cosmicforce who wrote (348432)	1/27/2003 4:12:13 PM
From: George Coyne	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

And? You blithely avoid my point.

To: cosmicforce who wrote (348432)	1/27/2003 4:22:06 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

You are misinformed. It is not a closed subject. The pros and cons are still being debated. Even the AMA finally had to admit there was no clinical basis for universal circumcision FOR ANY REASON, including penile cancer.

To: cosmicforce who wrote (348432)	1/27/2003 4:45:25 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Did you know that universal circumcision was adopted in the late Victorian age as a preventative cure to "masturbatory insanity?" Is this a denial?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (348432)	1/27/2003 4:51:13 PM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Felatio is much more likely to occur snipped vs. unsnipped, so perhaps the great fraud isn't so bad afterall. I guess it depends on one's perspective... ~SB~

To: cosmicforce who wrote (348432)	1/27/2003 4:57:01 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

LOL, Speaking of things done without science... or Speaking of things posted suggesting a clear ignorance of basic biology. What creates a good medium for the growth of bacteria and fungus. A sheath of skin located in a dark warm place creates a perfect moisture retention area for the growth of anything that may find it's way there. Removing that skin greatly reduces moisture. For many bacteria and fungus this would reduce growth rates from hundreds fold to completely. So I do wonder what mistake was ever made.... What insanity causes a comicfarce to post such is of little concern.