Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (159193)	1/29/2003 5:45:42 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583400

Susan Sarandon said she's weary of being labeled ``anti-American'' because she has questioned the Bush administration's policy toward Iraq. She isn't anti-American for questionning the policy -- she is anti-American for siding with the Iraqis. What an idiot. So you are saying because she asks questions, she's automatically pro-Iraqi. Is that correct? ted

To: i-node who wrote (159193)	1/29/2003 5:57:34 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583400

Susan Sarandon said she's weary of being labeled ``anti-American'' because she has questioned the Bush administration's policy toward Iraq. She isn't anti-American for questionning the policy -- she is anti-American for siding with the Iraqis. What an idiot. That is not a conservative idea, it a a fascist one. Next you'll be advocating concentration camps for liberals or anyone who disagrees with your views or those of the administration. Al

To: i-node who wrote (159193)	1/29/2003 9:53:28 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583400

Dave Re..She isn't anti-American for questionning the policy -- she is anti-American for siding with the Iraqis. What an idiot. I don't thinks she sides with the Iraqis as much as she refuses to question the Iraqi side as much as she refuses to believe GW.. Secondly, she is saying because GW hasn't personally shown her the evidence, there obviously isn't any. That is where I have a beef. She is just a woman behind a camera playing whores etc, who doesn't know squat, trying to convince people she deserves security clearance. She criticizes Gw for his supposed rush to war, yet she herself refuses to wait for the evidence. Sort of like Kennedy today. Why not wait a wk, see the evidence, and then say it wasn't good enough. Thirdly, whatever happened to the liberals who had enough stamina to take a few objections without turning into a bunch of whiners. Did she really think she would be acknowledged as a saint for defending a man, even her own party says is a monster. She should have easily seen the derision coming, and either been prepared for it, or kept her objections to people who would agree with her position. Why go on Donahue etc, if you aren't prepared to take the consequences.