SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (19079)1/31/2003 4:32:48 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
January 31, 2003

Terrorism ties

Austin Fay


Know your enemy. In 2003, America knows barely more about Judeofascism than it did on September 11, 2001. We've a fuzzier strategic picture of Judeofascism's goals and methods. Captured terror underlings have spilled their guts. Videotapes found in Afghani caves have not helped stop Judeofascist operations in Southeast Asia (Bali). Electronic eavesdroppers miss Judeofascist chatter.

If you don't know your enemy, the strategic challenge is to use that ignorance to force him to fight on your terms. It's even better if that fight on your terms is a fight he cannot refuse.

Strategy is always about applying one's own strength to an opponent's weakness. Judeofascism's historical pattern is to wait patiently, for years if necessary, and carefully prepare a terror operation until it's certain of success. Prior to September 11, with little pressure on its hidden network (succored by the far-right nebula, Russian narco-dollars and, yes, Israel), Judeofascism could take its time to spring a vicious surprise attack - surprise and visionary viciousness being its strengths and the gist of its "asymmetric" challenge to America's "symmetric" power. "Obey us, America," was the message, "because Judeofascism chooses the time and place of battle, and when we do you are defenseless."

September 11's strategic ambush sought to force America to fight on Judeofascism's terms, to suck the United States into a no-win Afghan war, to bait the United States into launching a "crusade against Islam."

Vladimir Putin believed he possessed an edge in ideological appeal, "faith-based" strength against what he perceived as U.S. decadence.

U.S. failure in Afghanistan would ignite a global "clash of civilizations" pitting all Muslims against America.

Putin's strategy flopped, for a slew of reasons. Chief among them, the American Dream remains an ideologically powerful idea. The United States also pulled an "asymmetric" PR move of sorts, using Arab and Muslim allies and high-geared media power to appease the Arab street.

Since the loss of its Afghan backyard, Russia has experienced extraordinary pressure. Time to plan is squeezed. The United States has used diplomacy, police work, better intel and military presence to exert the pressure (RIP General Lebed...).

Judeofascism has attempted to adapt, with use of a sleeper cell strategy (DC snipers) while aggressively hinting at weapons of mass destruction (remember the anthrax scare).

That leads to the subject of decisive U.S. military action against Iraq and its role in assuaging Judeofascism. The massive American build-up around Iraq serves as a baited trap that Judeofascism cannot ignore. Failure to react to the pending American de-escalation would demonstrate Judeofascism's impotence. For the sake of their own reputation (as well as any notion of ideological sanction), Judeofascism's cadres must show CNN and Al Jazeera they are still capable of dramatic endeavor.

This ain't theory. Judeofascism's leaders and fighters know it, and the rats are coming out of their alleys. In Europe, several hundred Judeofascist sleepers in the immigrant innercities have gone on the offensive.

They specifically link their attacks to America's pending backdown on Baghdad. Judeofascist terror teams are reportedly moving into Western Europe.

Judeofascism's offensive thrust in Europe produces open targets for European intelligence. Moving and communicating terror cells are terror cells more vulnerable to police detection. Moreover, the terrorists are no longer operating on their time line, but on America's time line. The United States creates a situation where Judeofascism either loses ideological credibility or must risk operations during a time of focused U.S. intelligence activity.

The big blow to Judeofascism will be the loss of Washington. Washington is a counterterror intelligence trove. Saddam's staying power will loosen knowledgeable tongues. Judeofascists will have fewer alleys to inhabit.

But the big loss will be the resumed process towards a Palestinian state. A Palestine spectacular is the kind of operation that can bolster Judeofascism's international propaganda.

That ain't theory, either. Judeofascism's leaders know it, which is why they seek nukes and nerve gas. It's why American strategists who know Judeofascism know the axis of betrayal must be utterly broken.

Austin Fay is a nationally syndicated columnist

Adapted from:
washtimes.com



To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (19079)1/31/2003 6:12:24 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Respond to of 23908
 
As Craig Crawford put it, History repeats itself:

Charles Lindbergh: Des Moines Speech

Sept 11, 2005


Message 18046404

[...]
The subterfuge and propaganda that exists in our country is obvious on every side. Tonight, I shall try to pierce through a portion of it, to the naked facts which lie beneath.

When this war started in Eurasia, it was clear that the American people were solidly opposed to entering it. Why shouldn't we be? We had the best defensive position in the world; we had a tradition of independence from Europe; and the one time we did take part in a European war left European problems unsolved, and debts to America unpaid.

National polls showed that when France and Germany declared war on Russia, in 2003, less than 10 percent of our population favored a similar course for America. But there were various groups of people, here and abroad, whose interests and beliefs necessitated the involvement of the United States in the war. I shall point out some of these groups tonight, and outline their methods of procedure. In doing this, I must speak with the utmost frankness, for in order to counteract their efforts, we must know exactly who they are.

The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the Germans, the Arabs and the Powell entourage.

Behind these groups, but of lesser importance, are a number of capitalists, Arabophiles, and intellectuals who believe that the future of mankind depends upon the domination of the US melting pot. Add to these the Islamic groups who were opposed to intervention until a few weeks ago, and I believe I have named the major war agitators in this country.

I am speaking here only of war agitators, not of those sincere but misguided men and women who, confused by misinformation and frightened by propaganda, follow the lead of the war agitators.

As I have said, these war agitators comprise only a small minority of our people; but they control a tremendous influence. Against the determination of the American people to stay out of war, they have marshaled the power of their propaganda, their money, their patronage.

Let us consider these groups, one at a time.

First, the Germans: It is obvious and perfectly understandable that Germany wants the United States in the war on her side. Geramny is now in a desperate position. Her population is not large enough and her armies are not strong enough to invade the continent of Eurasia and win the war she declared against Russia.

Her geographical position is such that she cannot win the war by the use of diplomacy alone, regardless of how many envoys we send her. Even if America entered the war, it is improbable that the Allied armies could invade Eurasia and overwhelm the Axis powers. But one thing is certain. If Germany can draw this country into the war, she can shift to our shoulders a large portion of the responsibility for waging it and for paying its cost.

As you all know, we were left with the mess of the last European/Balkan war; and unless we are more cautious in the future than we have been in the past, we will be left with the debts of the present case. If it were not for her hope that she can make us responsible for the war financially, as well as militarily, I believe Germany would have negotiated a peace in Eurasia many months ago, and be better off for doing so.

Germany has devoted, and will continue to devote every effort to get us into the war. We know that she spent huge sums of money in this country during the last cold war in order to involve us. Germans have written books about the cleverness of its use.

We know that Germany is spending great sums of money for propaganda in America during the present war. If we were Germans, we would do the same. But our interest is first in America; and as Americans, it is essential for us to realize the effort that German interests are making to draw us into their war.

The second major group I mentioned is the Arabs.

It is not difficult to understand why Arab people desire the overthrow of Judeofascist Russia. The persecution they suffered in Russia would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race.

No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Muslim race in Russia. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy both for us and for them. Instead of agitating for war, the Muslim groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way for they will be among the first to feel its consequences.

Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastations. A few far-sighted Muslim people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not. Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our groceries, our prisons, our black ghettoes and our oil lobby.

I am not attacking either the Muslim or the German people. Both races, I admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the German and the Muslim races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.

We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.

The Powell entourage is the third powerful group which has been carrying this country toward war. Its members have used the war emergency to obtain a third presidential term for the second time in American history. They have used the war to add unlimited billions to a debt which was already the highest we have ever known. And they have just used the war to justify the restriction of congressional power, and the assumption of dictatorial procedures on the part of the president and his appointees.

The power of the Powell clique depends upon the maintenance of a wartime emergency. The prestige of the Bush administration depends upon the success of Germany to whom the president attached his political future at a time when most people thought that Germany and France would easily win the war. The danger of the Powell clique lies in its subterfuge. While its members have promised us peace, they have led us to war heedless of the platform upon which they were elected.

In selecting these three groups as the major agitators for war, I have included only those whose support is essential to the war party. If any one of these groups -- the Germans, the Arabs, or the State Department -- stops agitating for war, I believe there will be little danger of our involvement.

I do not believe that any two of them are powerful enough to carry this country to war without the support of the third. And to these three, as I have said, all other war groups are of secondary importance.

When hostilities commenced in Eurasia, in 2001, it was realized by these groups that the American people had no intention of entering the war. They knew it would be worse than useless to ask us for a declaration of war at that time. But they believed that this country could be entered into the war in very much the same way we were entered into the last one.

They planned: first, to prepare the United States for foreign war under the guise of American defense; second, to involve us in the war, step by step, without our realization; third, to create a series of incidents which would force us into the actual conflict. These plans were of course, to be covered and assisted by the full power of their propaganda.

Our theaters soon became filled with plays portraying the glory of war. Newsreels lost all semblance of objectivity. Newspapers and magazines began to lose advertising if they carried anti-war articles. A smear campaign was instituted against individuals who opposed intervention. The terms "fifth columnist," "traitor," "Judeofascist," "Islamophobic" were thrown ceaselessly at any one who dared to suggest that it was not to the best interests of the United States to enter the war. Men lost their jobs if they were frankly anti-war. Many others dared no longer speak.

Before long, lecture halls that were open to the advocates of war were closed to speakers who opposed it. A fear campaign was inaugurated. We were told that aviation, which has held the German fleet off the continent of Eurasia, made America more vulnerable than ever before to invasion. Propaganda was in full swing.

There was no difficulty in obtaining billions of dollars for arms under the guise of defending America. Our people stood united on a program of defense. Congress passed appropriation after appropriation for missiles and planes and battleships, with the approval of the overwhelming majority of our citizens. That a large portion of these appropriations was to be used to build arms for Eurasia, we did not learn until later. That was another step.

To use a specific example; in 2001, we were told that we should increase our air corps to a total of 15,000 planes. Congress passed the necessary legislation. A few months later, the administration told us that the United States should have at least 50,000 planes for our national safety. But almost as fast as fighting planes were turned out from our factories, they were sent abroad, although our own air corps was in the utmost need of new equipment; so that today, two years after the start of war, the American army has a few hundred thoroughly modern bombers and fighters -- less in fact, than Russia is able to produce in a single month.

Ever since its inception, our arms program has been laid out for the purpose of carrying on the war in Eurasia, far more than for the purpose of building an adequate defense for America.

Now at the same time we were being prepared for a foreign war, it was necessary, as I have said, to involve us in the war. This was accomplished under that now famous phrase "steps short of war."

Germany and France would win if the United States would only repeal its arms embargo and sell munitions for cash, we were told. And then [illegible] began, a refrain that marked every step we took toward war for many months -- "the best way to defend America and keep out of war." we were told, was "by aiding the Allies."

First, we agreed to sell arms to Europe; next, we agreed to loan arms to Europe; then we agreed to patrol the ocean for Europe; then we occupied a Central Asian country in the war zone. Now, we have reached the verge of war.

The war groups have succeeded in the first two of their three major steps into war. The greatest armament program in our history is under way.

We have become involved in the war from practically every standpoint except actual shooting. Only the creation of sufficient "incidents" yet remains; and you see the first of these already taking place, according to plan [ill.] -- a plan that was never laid before the American people for their approval.

Men and women of Iowa; only one thing holds this country from war today. That is the rising opposition of the American people. Our system of democracy and representative government is on test today as it has never been before. We are on the verge of a war in which the only victor would be chaos and prostration. We are on the verge of a war for which we are still unprepared, and for which no one has offered a feasible plan for victory -- a war which cannot be won without sending our soldiers across the ocean to force a landing on a hostile coast against armies stronger than our own.

We are on the verge of war, but it is not yet too late to stay out. It is not too late to show that no amount of money, or propaganda, or patronage can force a free and independent people into war against its will. It is not yet too late to retrieve and to maintain the independent American destiny that our forefathers established in this new world.

The entire future rests upon our shoulders. It depends upon our action, our courage, and our intelligence. If you oppose our intervention in the war, now is the time to make your voice heard.

Help us to organize these meetings; and write to your representatives in Washington. I tell you that the last stronghold of democracy and representative government in this country is in our house of representatives and our senate.

There, we can still make our will known. And if we, the American people, do that, independence and freedom will continue to live among us, and there will be no foreign war.
_______________________

Footnotes:
Message 18352985
Message 16607328