Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (4883)	2/2/2003 2:04:10 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

I think the absence of a date is irrelevant. "Material breach" is the standard. And as for UN approval, the resolution itself combined with "material breach" provides it.

To: PartyTime who wrote (4883)	2/2/2003 2:07:15 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

I think the absence of a date is irrelevant. "Material breach" is the standard. And as for UN approval, the resolution itself combined with "material breach" provides it.

To: PartyTime who wrote (4883)	2/4/2003 10:22:05 PM
From: Vitas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

>>You choose only to rely on Resolution 1441<< actually I simply asked you to show us why Saddam is exempt from complying with the provisions of 1441 you keep pointing the finger at Bush when in fact it is Saddam that is at fault >>Tell us where in Resolution 1441 it states that the US should invade Iraq without UN approval.<< the deadline was 30 days from November 8th - a long time ago the Resolution states: 2. Decides, while acknowledging paragraph 1 above, to afford Iraq, by this resolution, a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations under relevant resolutions of the Council; and accordingly decides to set up an enhanced inspection regime with the aim of bringing to full and verified completion the disarmament process established by resolution 687 (1991) and subsequent resolutions of the Council no second resolution is necessary in Resolution 1441: A second UN resolution authorizing war on Iraq not needed: Graham guelphmercury.com Britain could act without UN ruling, says Hoon politics.guardian.co.uk They also agreed a second United Nations Security Council resolution authorising force against Iraq would be "welcome" but not necessary. uk.news.yahoo.com Germany won't insist on a 2d UN resolution iht.com <<Tell us where in Resolution 1441 it states that the US should invade Iraq with UN approval at a time certain. You can't!<< why don't you point us to the language in Resolution 1441 that says we can't invade Iraq without UN approval