To: American Spirit who wrote (159905 ) 2/3/2003 12:41:12 PM From: hmaly Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576346 Eric...Can you imagine if Clinton had a private mega-corporation his family was heavily invested in along with the Bin Lauden family and dozens of former democrat powerhouses. I know this may come as a shock to you, but any proof of wrong doing would be nice. But for all the questions, Carlyle has stayed clean in the eyes of the law. Lobbying laws in Washington, D.C., are ambiguous at best, requiring only that former politicians observe a one-year "cooling-off period" before they reënter the lobbying scene on behalf of industry. It is playing within this gray area that has given the Carlyle Group some of the best returns in the business. And this part The Bush administration isn't afraid to mix business and politics, and no other firm embodies that penchant better than the Carlyle Group. Walking that fine line is what Carlyle does best. We may not see Osama bin Laden's brothers at Carlyle's investor conferences any more, but business will go on as usual for the biggest old boys network around. As Mr. Snow puts it, "Carlyle will always have to defend itself and will never be able to convince certain people that they aren't capable of forging murky backroom deals. George Bush's father does profit when the Carlyle Group profits, but to make the leap that the president would base decisions on that is to say that the president is corrupt." The simple fact is that you have no proof, just allegations. George Bush Sr. is entitled to make investments, and use his political power to call upon politicians, just like any other lobbyists; and the article clearly states that. Is lobbying crooked. I would say so, but to say Bush Sr is more crooked than everyone else is stretching it. I would like to get rid of all lobbyists, for both sides, and end all possible conflicts of interests for everyone, not just either rep. or dems; but both sides.