Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (352868)	2/3/2003 3:27:07 PM
From: Steve Dietrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

<<Thank God the US Supreme Court ruled correctly in the matter.>> Be thankful they ruled the way you wanted them to, but i hardly think they ruled correctly. In fact i honestly can't understand their ruling. They said that re-counting the votes using different standards in different counties violated the equal protection clause. But the votes were originally counted using different standards in different counties, and the mandatory recount was done using different standards in different counties. Why weren't the original vote and first recount violations of the equal protection clause? Standards and methods of counting vary from state to state and even from county to county in the states. Isn't every election then a violation of the equal protection clause? Steve