SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (354024)2/5/2003 12:48:50 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Respond to of 769670
 
Take away the 1 to 2 million fabricated GOre votes, and the Bush landslide cannot be denied. I guess that's why you anti-Americans still live in denial of the public exposure of that crime...



To: American Spirit who wrote (354024)2/5/2003 12:51:09 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Bush is going down the dusty trail....and leaving behind the American way
War on Progressive Taxes
President Bush hauled out the heavy artillery Monday,
but not against Iraq or North Korea -- indeed, his
budget made no mention of how he'll pay for any
actions he may take in those places. Rather his
$2.23-trillion spending proposal for 2004 declares war
on the idea of a progressive tax code. In slashing taxes
while dismissing the importance of deficits, the
administration is pushing the most radical change in
economic policy since Ronald Reagan, if not the New
Deal.

A flat-out retreat from the idea that the Internal
Revenue Service should take from the rich at a higher
rate than from the poor, the budget contains a
two-pronged attack on the progressive tax code that
would basically end taxation on investment income.
For starters, it would let individuals off the hook for
taxes on corporate dividend income.

In addition, Bush has floated the idea of creating
"lifetime savings accounts." A family of four could stash
up to $30,000 a year in the accounts, plus $15,000
more in new tax-free retirement savings. But the
Americans to whom the government should be giving a
break are the ones who worry about stretching their
paychecks to cover groceries, auto insurance and rent
or mortgage payments, not those who fret about
sheltering income from taxes.

As the proposal stands, a corporate attorney could dip into her lifetime savings
account to, say, add a sauna to her weight room and still not need to worry
about retirement funds. However, a custodian might well deplete his meager
savings each time he had to replace a dead refrigerator or the head gasket on his
Chevy and could wind up broke at 65.

Bush's skewed spending priorities only make the situation more exasperating. He
wants to shower money on the Pentagon, raising its budget to $380 billion,
including as much as $9.1 billion for the dubious missile defense program. At the
same time, he wants to put stringent requirements on families applying for
reduced or free school lunches or seeking to claim the earned income tax credit
-- the government's main assistance to low-income workers. Family literacy,
rural development, environmental protection and education are among the items
that Bush would cut back.

Tightening the money spent on a handful of important programs isn't going to
keep the country from plummeting into trillion-dollar deficits. To avoid the
economic abyss, Washington must resist the urge to pass a raft of tax cuts that
would further enrich the wealthy while starving the government.