SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chomolungma who wrote (67628)2/5/2003 2:40:29 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Well I agree with this completely and I think I said as much in my first post on the matter. The heart of the matter is (as you point out):

Iraq is believed to have contracts worth about $38 billion pending with such companies as Italy's ENI (E ), Royal Dutch/Shell (RD ), Australia's BHP (BHP ), TotalFinaElf, and Russian giant Lukoil. Sanctions have precluded American companies from doing business in Iraq

End of the matter! Europe is making money in Iraq. US is not making money but wants to. The problem for America is that over the past decade they have vilainized Saddam so much that it is a big embarassment to sign a contract with him. So the only solution left to the US is to get rid of Saddam so as to save face and then go after all the oil contracts. Europe on the other hand is happy with the status quo and sees no reason to rock the boat. Everything else is just disgusting excuses to redirect attention from this.

Thanks for making my point for me.

ST



To: chomolungma who wrote (67628)2/5/2003 2:46:07 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
BTW, this article also answers the issue of who will control the oil fields after the war. It seems that I am not the only one who thinks it will be America and not some international body that will set the rules.