SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PartyTime who wrote (6427)2/7/2003 5:46:58 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Respond to of 25898
 
Once people connect the dots -- I doubt that Bush could win a race for dogcatcher.

Here in Florida and around the nation we have a MAJOR crisis in hospital care. Draconian budget cuts and severe shortages of nurses are causing thousands of deaths from medical errors annually. And this has A LOT to do with the Bushie drive for war and tax cuts for the affluent instead of meeting the needs of average citizens.

i



To: PartyTime who wrote (6427)2/7/2003 6:07:06 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
3,000 Americans killed by the acts of a small group, measured against an estimated 500,000 killed from the acts of a GOP-led group.
Are you trying to out-Duray Duray?

That reminds me of this:
Duray's infamous post (or as close as you can get):
Message 17703379

You'll notice that Ray's original post post has been deleted. The deletion was quite a while after the original post. I suspect he asked that it be deleted because it proved to be such an embarrassment.

So tell me: Only about 2,000 were killed at Pearl Harbor- -less than WTC. Should we have told the Japanese they could have China and Hawaii in response to that attack?

You amaze me with this.



To: PartyTime who wrote (6427)2/7/2003 8:15:21 PM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
3,000 Americans killed by the acts of a small group, measured against an estimated 500,000 killed from the acts of a GOP-led group.

that about says it all

you fit my earlier post today to a T

"some are more anti-Bush then anti-war and this is a perfect vehicle to chirp their anti-Bush agenda"

"others quite frankly are still in the Vietnam mode - [an entirely different situation]"

I get it now, it's about Bush stupid

and just in case you don't get it, it's not about retaliation for the WTC, it's about Iraq harboring WMD, it's about Iraq not coming in compliance with UN resolutions - it's about 12 years of not honoring the conditions of the cease fire agreement they sign after invading Kuwait and being defeated in the Gulf War



To: PartyTime who wrote (6427)2/8/2003 4:24:11 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 25898
 
Huh?

Incredible....

Why don't you volunteer for human shield duty...???