Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (27821)	2/9/2003 1:51:58 PM
From: Mike M2	Respond to of 36161

M, what's strange is that many criticize US policy of the 30s for being too isolationist now we are criticized for too much intervention. Personally , I would prefer to err on the side of isolationism since our meddling does seem to create many enemies. Mike

To: mishedlo who wrote (27821)	2/9/2003 7:47:59 PM
From: re3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36161

if Al Q and Iraq are not linked why do you think there would be serious attacks by Al Q ? Either they are or they are not linked...this enemy loves the concept of linkage...back in the days of GW-one i remember sadaam h talking linkage about the palestinians...sure, that is why he went into Kuwait...something to do with the palestinians...unfortunately for the western world, Al Q might blame an invasion of Iraq for something that they might well have been planning to do anyway. you also mention the WTC and suggest that might not have happened except for the CIA and american troops on Arab soil...what then do you attribute the attack in Bali to ?