Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (14840)	2/11/2003 6:48:03 PM
From: James Calladine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

Any "God" had to exist in time False. Time is a measurement based on the supposed separation of beings, things, objects. God-Consciousness is the Consciousness of the Oneness of All and Everything (in which only Eternity exists--and NO sense of time)for the reason that there is no separation and NO sense of difference or distance between anything whatsoever. Paradoxically God also exists IN Time as that which lives all and everything. Your reasoning is based on egoic existence, Solon, as if nothing else exists. Even relatively traditional psychologists such as Maslow and Jung would disagree with that. Namaste! Jim

To: Solon who wrote (14840)	2/12/2003 10:52:03 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

Being a strict materialist and someone who claims to prize logic and science. I would think the kinds of statements you make should cause you to blush. "The building blocks of the many "things" which are in the universe are tiny tiny particles which have movement......These facts have nothing to do with questions of ultimate origin. " I totally agree! Since we have been discussing ultimate origin; why aren't you posting relevant arguments? How does "tiny tiny" help to explain the existence of "things". Scientists can and do trace the effects in the universe back to an ultimate beginning. Some people want to bring in spontaneous generation at that point to rescue them, others simply posit infinite regression of a finite universe. Both of these answers are unscientific and illogical.