Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : My House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: thames_sider who wrote (5012)	2/12/2003 7:51:05 AM
From: Poet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7689

I think much of Rumsfeld's, Ashcroft's, and Bush's tone has indeed contributed to the increasingly negative tone on the part of much of the world about our plans for Iraq. How's that for an answer?

To: thames_sider who wrote (5012)	2/12/2003 8:43:22 AM
From: Original Mad Dog	Respond to of 7689

I don't consider it jingoism to point out why Iraq needs to be dealt with harshly. I agree that many of the posts on SI, and at times here, are not reasoned. I would apply that description to many of the arguers on both sides. One of the reasons why I started posting speeches and UN documents in their entirety is to avoid that. In my experience, you can say whatever you want, but when there are facts and opinions set down on paper you have to deal with them more rationally, or if you don't, it will be obvious.