Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LPS5 who wrote (8174)	2/14/2003 1:20:42 PM
From: ajax99	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

your logic is flawed America changes its standards based on its desires. Why attack Iraq and not Israel? Why support use of weapons of mass destruction at some times and not others. It is called integrity. The USA is using propaganda to confuse its citizens. The USA is trying to split hairs - why this huge focus on Iraq. The USA is in no danger from Iraq, your own CIA confirms this.

To: LPS5 who wrote (8174)	2/14/2003 2:33:05 PM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Should we not be friendly with German and Japan because we fought bloody wars with them earlier this century? I believe the point is that the very GUY the US supported (not only holding his hand, but with weapons etc) is the one they are attacking on the basis of him being "evil". If Hitler were still alive and if the US got friendly with him, the same criticism would surely apply. As it is, Germany has a different ideology now, and is run by completely different people. So it's OK to be friendly from an "integrity" point of view. but you're unsurprisingly leaving out the volume of other evidence against Iraq Like what, exactly?