To: i-node who wrote (161357 ) 2/18/2003 12:53:50 AM From: tejek Respond to of 1574965 As to your remark, its a patently stupid one. The United States has in no way been complicit in Saddam's murders. This is typical liberal idiocy, blaming the gun manufacturer for the death of someone who was shot with a gun. Wrong again, I'm afraid. Its not a stupid supposition. The gun manu. makes the gun but doesn't know the character of the person who's buying it. We knew what nature of Saddam was.......a corrupt, ruthless tyrant. And yet Reagan, Bush Sr. and Rumsfield gave him what he wanted in terms of WMD........poisons and germs as shown below and nuclear components. And these are the honorable and great people you want me to trust and let them do what's best for this country. I don't think so................. BTW the link is to a libertarian group that sounds like it has conservative roots. It makes me feel good to know that not all conservatives are cut from the same cloth. ted fff.org Following Iraq's Bioweapons Trail Sen. Robert Byrd, a master at hectoring executive branch witnesses, asked Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld a provocative question last week: Did the United States help Saddam Hussein produce weapons of biological warfare? Rumsfeld brushed off the Senate's 84-year-old president pro tem like a Pentagon reporter. But a paper trail indicates Rumsfeld should have answered yes. An eight-year-old Senate report confirms that disease- producing and poisonous materials were exported, under U.S. government license, to Iraq from 1985 to 1988 during the Iran-Iraq war. Furthermore, the report adds, the American- exported materials were identical to microorganisms destroyed by United Nations inspectors after the Gulf War. The shipments were approved despite allegations that Saddam used biological weapons against Kurdish rebels and (according to the current official U.S. position) initiated war with Iran.