SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: willcousa who wrote (361599)2/20/2003 10:55:24 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I am sorry but that is a VERY CRASS COMMENT. Most of those FAMILY FARMS have been in existence for GENERATIONS, long before any of these big COMBINES. The combines get many breaks and MOST OF THE SUBSIDIES not the family farmer. Have a little heart. jdn



To: willcousa who wrote (361599)2/20/2003 11:20:48 AM
From: Sedohr Nod  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Not so sure that is a totally accurate picture of the situation...If the average worker in this or any other country was as productive and efficient as the family farmer then you would have goods and services 3 feet deep around the globe....Free markets and zero protectionism would put a lot of non-U.S. agriculture out of business quickly...and sure, there are those that "farm the programs", but governmental involvement in agriculture has minimal results just like any of their other meddling..



To: willcousa who wrote (361599)2/20/2003 11:47:43 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 769670
 
Some were productive at some point, but farm productivity increased to such a point that we simply did not need the same labor percentage of farmers tilling the soil, and gradually, through the 20th century, we decreased from about 50% of the population in farm related business, to about 5%. Now, corporate farms often benefit from programs designed for the family farmer, which is wrong......