Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (76143)	2/20/2003 9:16:47 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

There has been much speculation about this: control of oil supplies, revenge by the son for the father, "finishing" the war in the Persian Gulf, pursuing a stalled war on terrorism that has nowhere else to go except against another government. Curious how many people find it easy to believe that Bush 43 is motivated by revenge even to point of conducting a self-destructive campaign, while finding it difficult to believe that Saddam Hussein could be motivated by revenge to any similar extent. Considering the natures and histories of the two men, quite an extraordinary conclusion.

To: stockman_scott who wrote (76143)	2/20/2003 11:37:50 PM
From: Sig	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<<<When it comes to the war on Iraq, "Why now?" >>> The man cannot tell hot from cold I started to walk around my place one day it was 111 degrees. Got about 500 ft, decided to go back to house and get some water before collapsing from dehydration Was not wearing a gas mask Was not in a Chemical protection suit Was not carrying a rifle and 50 lbs of gear Was not sitting inside a tank with engine running Was not in a desert - in fact had some shade Now go ask the writer how hot it gets in Iraq in the summer Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh Sig