Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (11287)	2/21/2003 3:17:49 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 25898

atimes.com

To: PartyTime who wrote (11287)	2/21/2003 6:43:59 AM
From: Vitas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Thanks PT, as a practical matter it would appear the second resolution route is going to be undertaken anyway, so the question may be moot. Conceptually, if your objective is peace, and no war, in this and the various other conflagrations that will be developing while we are both drinking Guinness for the foreseeable future, how do you propose that the world's demand that Saddam disarm be achieved? Message 18603717 He has already materially breached 1441, what should the UN do from here? How much more time do you think that he should get? Is there a link in your updated thread header for e-mailing Iraq, both at the UN and in Iraq demanding that he fully comply with UN 1441 so that war can be averted? (I looked and could not find it)