SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jim_p who wrote (18794)2/23/2003 2:04:16 PM
From: quehubo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206110
 
Perhaps, but we are rapidly approaching a record low in NG storage with cold weather upon us and probably record low production.

I updated Oilviews with my storage calculations showing 531 as the ending using Lehmans calculation which has proven fairly accurate. Besides Lehman's formula resulted in fairly similar draws to last year once adjusted for 3 bcf per day production difference.

Off to see...Daredevil.



To: jim_p who wrote (18794)2/23/2003 3:32:17 PM
From: energyplay  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206110
 
Does E&P decouple from OSX here ?

If oil people are scared to drill, they won't bid up prices for oil services. Not drilling does not fix the supply problem. The only thing that gets fixed is the E&P balance sheets.

So does E&P debt get paid down first, Iraq uncertainty get resolved, and THEN OSX moves up again - meanwhile, E&Ps should be making lots of money....

That temperature anomaly map looks really cold, especially where there are big populations. Canada looks to be really hard hit the next two weeks.



To: jim_p who wrote (18794)2/23/2003 9:46:22 PM
From: Archie Meeties  Respond to of 206110
 
Yes, but the broader media is oblivious.

OSX will not hold up in another market downdraft. That's the risk, IMO. And I think it's a significant risk as we get closer to Iraq.