SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (161953)2/23/2003 7:40:53 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579762
 
Nonsense. Had Saddam destroyed 2,000,000 lbs of chemical agent it WOULD have been accounted for. To compare this with an immaterial loss of assets at Los Alamos is obviously not a meaningful comparison. Nothing on earth is more certain than Saddam's guilt, and no thinking person could conclude otherwise (the idiots who are protesting the upcoming war are excluded on the basis that they are not thinking people).

This is the most preposterous, most unAmerican garbage I have ever heard. You want to go to war, killing thousands and costing billions, based on your supposition that he is guilty because you say so.

Fortunately, some thinking people don't agree.

ted



To: i-node who wrote (161953)2/23/2003 9:16:30 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579762
 
>Nothing on earth is more certain than Saddam's guilt, and no thinking person could conclude otherwise (the idiots who are protesting the upcoming war are excluded on the basis that they are not thinking people).

Put me in the nonthinking category, Dave.

-Z


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News