Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (12262)	2/24/2003 12:56:57 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

CORRECTION: Brumar, you wrote the following: >>>Even Partytime, the thread host, here just said earlier today he thinks Saddam retains chemical weapons - of course, he trusts Saddam to only use them defensively.<<< Please note my comment was that I suspect "Saddam to only use them defensively." Consider logically that it was easy for South Africa to give up its weaponry. It's a bit more difficult for Iraq, given its history and location, to do the same so easily. Remember, Iran turned the tide and was winning against Iraq when he used them. It'd be my reasonable bet he's probably got a defensive supply, which he would hide, for any force that would attempt to take Baghdad. He's a military man in a military world and thinking of military conditions.