Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Return to Sender who wrote (8785)	2/25/2003 5:40:53 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95640

I don't mind sharing my indicators, but I use instinct above all else. So I don't know how much of use they can be to others. Among the short term indicators, perhaps the most reliable is how many standard deviation a stock (or index) is from its moving average. This works both on the up and down direction and is a measure of how fast something has moved. I use this to take a contrary position. There has to be at least a 4 sigma move for me to consider the position, though I prefer a 6 sigma. This type of thing doesn't happen often, but there are at least a couple of good trades every year. On a broad base measure, I like to look at the percentage of stocks that are 2 standard deviations above (or below) their 200DMA. If you get say a quarter of stocks being 2 sigma above the 200DMA, then it is a good bet that you are approaching the breaking point. The caveat is that this could go on for a while, but the odds are heavily with you. For my regular trend watch, I chart stocks on a 3 day time frame and use Bollinger Bands in along with fast stochastics, MACD, and William's %R. My volume indicators are modified Chaikin's money flow which I like much better than OBV (but is used the same way) and price-by-volume. But the single most important thing is using my instincts. I look at a stock and fallow it around for weeks the way a hunter fallows his prey. I learn its habits and quirks. I try to see how it moves in relation to its industry and the general market. Then I form a thesis for the position I take (long or short). The thesis is always formed based on fundamentals but uses TA for assistance. If at any time the stock stops behaving as I expect it in relation to the "character" I have understood of it, then I am out. Also, I constantly reexamin the thesis. If it is not unfolding as I thought, again I am out. My current thesis is that (a) it is getting time for semiconductors to resume their up cycle. I expect this to happen around May. IF that happens, I will favor chips over equipment because I think it will still be a buyers market. MXIM, TXN, XLNX are among my favorites. I made good money of all things on YHOO (which I never touched during the bubble). This is because I believe in the promise of Internet and I think the few surviving companies will rip the benefits in peace. Similarly, I will load up on NT and some of the telecoms. But they have to behave or they are out. My point here is that I have ideas as to why I want to own the stocks that I own. My ideas seem damn reasonable to me. In fact, my character flaw is that I can be so evangelical about my picks that sometimes I fail to see the most obvious flaws. The way I protect myself against this is re-evaluating my view against what is happening in the real world. If things are not unfolding as I expect them, then I re-examine everything from scratch. (OT: I wish Washington would do the same thing :) Sun Tzu