Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (13144)	2/26/2003 9:33:50 AM
From: Chas.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25898

what is the problem here anyway....? World Domination by the USA is the end game......... The sooner we get on with it the better for all concerned. We will be a benevolent force, dealing out justice on a fair and equal platform. After all.... the bottom line here is the preservation of "our way of life", "our standard of living" and of course "our national security" we will be able to pass these values along to our grandchildren as long as we prevail.....right....? any American citizens have a problem with that.....?

To: zonder who wrote (13144)	2/26/2003 6:34:39 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

Do you ever sleep? :-) Not last night.. But I have a feeling after the day I had today, I'll have little problem tonight... :0) Oh OK then we should definitely invade Iraq. Actually, I'm hoping that we don't have to.. All it requires is for Saddam Hussein to resign and the structure laid for a transitional government to be formed. I'm not interested in invading Iraq at all.. HOWEVER, I do want Saddam Hussein to be ousted.. But if he refuses to step down, then it will become necessary to remove him. And I pray that this action can be taken with as little loss of life on all sides as possible. But from your tone, and choice of workds, it would sound like you actually doubt that Saddam is a supporter of terrorism.. Do you really believe such a thing?? And if not, then why are you so intent on preventing actions being taken that lead to his downfall?? Need I remind you that known terrorists have stayed in MANY places around the planet and that cannot be a reason to invade any country And need I remind, my dear Zonder, that it is Saddam's FAILURE TO COMPLY with UNSC BINDING RESOLUTIONS that justify the overthrow of his government, whether by invasion, or through an internal coup (which is not out of the question). His support of terrorism is only one more rationale for eliminating his regime from the face of the middle east... Why is it that you seem to continually avoid discussing the 17 UNSC resolutions that Saddam has failed to comply with?? Why is it that you seem to wish to ignore the 6,000 chemical warheads that his government has failed to properly account for?? Why Zonder.. That's what exasperating to me.. you choose to focus on peripheral and irrelevant issues (terrorism and who supplied him those WMD technologies) while completely ignoring the UNSC resolutions that have been passed over a period of 12 years, all failing to win his compliance... And without his compliance, it's like the cease fire that ended Desert Storm never occurred.. The cease fire is "null and void".. Hawk