SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : CFZ E-Wiggle Workspace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Shack who wrote (140)2/26/2003 10:33:35 AM
From: At_The_Ask  Respond to of 41499
 
A note on the yesterdays rally. I would say a good majority of the covering that went on was due to the threat that HP might have blowout numbers and cause a giant rally like they did in nov 02. I'm sure their were rumors to that effect spread around to speed things along. The Iraq russia thing sounded good on CNBS but IMO HP had a lot to do with it.

Obviously HP sucked so if the market go's up it's due to some other reason. If they start buying HP that could be the tell that something is up.

There should be a decent sell off on the disapointment, but so far we havent seen it.
We are also slightly below the .618 retrace of the move from fridays highs. Until we take that with gusto then this is just a correction.

Wave wise we are in wave four of 1 so we should get a little pop for 5 up then wave two to correct the entire run from yesterdays low. All that assumes we aren't going to melt. Melt is my favored.



To: Shack who wrote (140)2/26/2003 10:39:11 AM
From: JRI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41499
 
Shack, if you "get" your scenario, that would bring a "Hound" on the Soxx right? And then we would "Hound" in reverse thereafter.....woa....got a price target/range?



To: Shack who wrote (140)2/26/2003 11:23:27 AM
From: Jack of All Trades  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41499
 
OT, OK your on... But I don't think they make it to 16... Hackett has let a few go by that he should have stopped. I think they expect Shields to let some go by but not Hackett. So when Hackett lets a few slide by that hurts moral... JMO



To: Shack who wrote (140)2/26/2003 11:54:11 AM
From: JRI  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41499
 
Shack-ster: I'm befuddled once again (what else is new?). Short-term/EOM bull move hosed here, or WTF going on?

So many cross-currents for next day/2....still trying to understand yesterday's turnaround (in context of today)