SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rock_nj who wrote (3990)2/26/2003 12:14:22 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8683
 
If we'd wanted to steal Iraq's oil, we'd already own it. Our military is capable of conquering a country, any country, within a week. (One day to nuke, six days to let the clouds disperse.) And we don't need thousands of troops to do it that way.

But, of course, any thinking person would know that we do not possess an expansionist or acquisitive doctrine, nor do we wish to inflict harm on humanity. Just the opposite. We are a peaceful nation charged with one of history's most awesome responsibilities, to keep the peace in a world rife with global tensions.

We are in the ME to protect our trading partners and peace.

We are in Europe to protect our trading partners and peace.

We are in Asia to protect our trading partners and peace.

These are the facts whether people like you want to accept them or not.



To: Rock_nj who wrote (3990)2/26/2003 8:56:46 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8683
 
rock you know nothing about energy markets.

I've worked in the energy industry for almost two decades.
If Bush were concerned about oil, he would have done what the minority nations of Europe (france and germany) are doing - he would have droppped all sanctions on Iraq and embraced the horror of saddam to get all the cheap oil.

It would cost us nothing dollarwise and yet, it would cost us all of our principles.

Is that what you want rock?