SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (13379)2/26/2003 5:11:13 PM
From: tsigprofit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25898
 
there are degrees of "anti-war"
Some people believe it's important to follow a
UN process...because, we currently have Saddam pretty
contained, with inspectors on the ground.

And - why should the US shoulder all of the work - and
pay for all of it?

If he becomes a bigger problem, maybe other nations
will be willing to join us - and not just the ones
we bribe with money to agree to let us go in.



To: KLP who wrote (13379)2/26/2003 6:54:09 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
I appreciate that you think I have all the answers- that's very kind of you. I can't say I feel that myself, but your compliment is accepted with all the sincerity of your offer of it. Since you think I have all the answers let me tell you most sincerely (and certainly) that just because people don't think there is a good reason to attack Iraq at this juncture (WMD's or no WMD's), that does not make them anti-American. I doubt there are many people here who are truly anti-American. There are a few non-Americans who might be a bit anti-American- and if there's a Frenchperson out there who is a little pissed off at the US, I cannot say I blame them, what with the anti-France rhetoric out there.

The antiwar movement is not monolithic. It encompasses people from the far left, a great many people from the middle, and even people from the far right. Most of those people are all loyal Americans. I strongly disagree with you, but I think it is silly to impugn your loyalty just because I do not agree with you. Even if you were about to injure this country, I would suspect you were doing it from good motives. That makes you only misguided, not a traitor. It is foolish not to recognize the difference I think. Obviously both sides will think the other misguided (such is the nature of taking "sides"), and a "danger" to America- but we need not think each other traitors. imo