Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tekboy who wrote (78187)	2/27/2003 11:42:48 AM
From: FaultLine	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

what did you think of it? I liked it but mostly because it put together a framework for me to think about these issues. I have been woefully ignorant of the various dimensions of the non-proliferation agreements and where the various players stand. Yes, I thought he came across as 'abolitionist', but I think he put a good stake in the ground by saying we need to be more consistent and lead by example. I've been unhappy for some time about the 'disarmament agreement' between W and P down at the ranch a year or so ago--very cynical I thought. the author was on firmer ground when he was attacking the Bushies than when he was proposing his own stuff. I agree. I thought he made some telling points, points I fought with myself not to embolden so they would not be missed. I hope everyone will read the paper because, besides providing a concise summary of the NPT, I think it presents us with several good starting points for discussion. I'd like to suggest to the thread that we reserve every Tuesday exclusively for discussions of specific items from Foreign Affairs. The Perkovich article would be the first such dissection. Opinions? --fl