Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (364566)	2/28/2003 10:28:05 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

No. The evidence of history lies in the other direction. >>> Wrong. Go back to my original post to you on this. History is replete with examples of societies organized differently... and pre-society, there is little evidence for monogamy, and considerable evidence for polygamy. >>> Looking outside of sociology for a minute, as I pointed out, the biological science give us innumerable examples across the animal kingdom to disprove your claim of 'biological destiny' for monogamy. The indisputable evidence of biology is 50-50 one man/one woman for the duration of life. >>> Er, wrong! >>> If you've got such 'evidence', present it. I say the evidence weighs heavily against you... and a simple examination of the literature will show that.