Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (364948)	3/3/2003 11:09:52 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Re: "R-I-G-H-T.... Behaviors are 'not natural'...." and your reply: Well they are not. >>> If they exist commonly - and they do - than that seems a fair use of the word. You cannot put them under a microscope. >>> Of course you can! Observation is observation. You cannot touch them. >>> "Can't 'touch' them?" That's a fairly silly comment, isn't it? They simply do not exist in nature. >>> Of course they do, as I pointed out... in countless profusion across thousands of species. Here you are clearly misinformed. Instead, they “exist” as expression OF natural things like lions, deer and humans. ONLY by observing nature can we observe behavior. >>> I made that observation, too. Sociological study of numerous societies make the same observational point: variance is normal. Bodies are natural, behaviors are not. >>> R-E-A-L-L-Y now... Isn't mind/body a functioning system?