SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (14146)3/1/2003 12:22:04 AM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 25898
 
Very interesting, Brumar. Did you note, however, that Iran still insists that the US not invade? Iran logically thinks it will be next once the US gains the military foothold in Iraq and begins pouring even more US troops into the region.

Thus, my fear that Iran, possibly even Syria, will reinforce Baghdad should the US-Brit forces have it in a state of siege. This combo team up would pit about one million against our 200 thousand, not to mention a whole lot of missles, tanks, planes and artilliary, etc. (chemicals maybe?) Do you think they might deem the two-member coalition force sitting in the desert as vulunerable?

The situation could turn into Nuke City, don't you think?



To: Brumar89 who wrote (14146)3/1/2003 10:51:13 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
Alas, that just shows that the Arab countries think we are P-whipped by Israel. That's a pretty sad thought. For those patriots here who deplore outside influences on American policy (like those darned peace marches around the world)- what WILL they think if Israel meddles?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News