SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Let's Start The War And Get It Over With -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Vitas who wrote (365)3/1/2003 9:35:39 PM
From: Augustus Gloop  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 808
 
I wouldn't give it to them. They have an self preservation interest in this too as countless refugees will be pouring over their border in the event of war. I fairly tired of having our pockets picked even when an action would be beneficial to another country. Some of the objectors to war have very valid points about how much money we ship to many of these countries. I don't think we should bankrupt our own society to buy security. I don't remember the exact totals on a per person basis that it costs the US in foreign aid but I think its rather large. Just having us as a friend saves most countries a lot of defense budget money. If thats not enough then I say let them have to fund a military budget like we do for a few years and maybe they will see the error of their ways



To: Vitas who wrote (365)3/1/2003 11:34:15 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 808
 
You think that's what has happened? Could be. It seemed rather strange that abstentions would be counted as effectively being "no" votes.