Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (79485)	3/4/2003 12:56:51 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"I think within the confines of the way the Bush-Rove combine operates, you have just asked, you won't like this, a political question, not a foreign policy question." Thats just a copout john--a way to avoid the question. With clinton it was the finger in the wind to determine policy. So what. When it comes to american lives, call me naive but our two most political presidents, clinton and bush, would act in the national interest. So forget Rove and cynical politics for a moment, someone should try to discover a third way--a way to avoid war without betraying our standing in the world or our allies. For instance during the Cuban MC, a way was found. War seemed imminent. We traded missiles in turkey for missiles in cuba but announced the former after the latter was completed. Perhaps the french can help with the compromise? mike