Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (366663)	3/5/2003 5:21:30 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

Time to pack up my troubles in my old kit bag and smile, smile, smile: Take care, have a good evening!

To: Neocon who wrote (366663)	3/5/2003 5:28:09 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

The circumstantial evidence suggests they went to the mall to start trouble. There is obviously more to the story... Like the fact that one guy is a lawyer and the other an ecologist. And the mall has had disturbances over the war in the past few months. In December, a couple dozen "peace" protestors showed up, bought peace shirts, put them on and paraded them around the mall causing a disturbance. Perhaps the mall personnel felt this was a continuation of that behavior. Perhaps that is why the mall felt compelled to post signs at the entrances that warned people not to wear apparel which could incite a disturbance. Wonder if these two yo-yos participated in the prior disturbances. And did you know that a police officer was summoned by mall security and spent over an hour trying to convince the guy to take his shirt off? And that the guy practically begged to be arrested? Lot's more to this story...

To: Neocon who wrote (366663)	3/5/2003 5:31:41 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

If this is only about the judgment of a security guard in a mall it isn't really worth discussing here is it?

To: Neocon who wrote (366663)	3/5/2003 5:33:18 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

So the spirit of the First Amendment means you have the right to go into any private property with any message on your clothing. I'm glad I don't live in your America. American citizens are in harms way. Hundreds of thousands are in this position. acute.ath.cx I see going into private property when so many have fears for the safety of their family as stupid and reckless. Even that normally tame message. In public is one thing and my home is another.