Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (163062)	3/6/2003 12:41:09 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572965

The latter would have meant America would have to stick around much longer than Bush Sr. intended. Unlike what we are proposing now, without UN consent this time. You say America got out of Iraq too soon back in 1991. Now you're thinking that America cannot get out of Iraq soon enough. Clearly you have two conflicting views, a common fault among all of the anti-war protesters you see these days. This is a compromise for me. This idea that Iraq is a threat to America is trumped up bullshit. But I recognize that there is another view and Bush has crossed a line he can't go back. Al

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (163062)	3/6/2003 1:28:53 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572965

Al is just clearly taking swipes at the Bushes/pubs. The same liberals were begging Bush sr. to not go into bagdad in 1991...feeling sorry for the poor Iraqis that got their butts kicked out of Kuwait. From what i see, the Dems only agenda is to undermine the current and past 'pub administrations. The Liberal media really becomes apparent at this time as well. They love covering the anti-war protests etc. Jim