Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (163076)	3/6/2003 2:55:40 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572515

Poll Shows Bush Would Lose to Democrat in Election History repeats itself...war and a bad economy are trademarks of losers. Ask his dad. Al

To: SilentZ who wrote (163076)	3/6/2003 3:06:39 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572515

-Z, Good article. Fortunately the constitution will not let the democrats run a candidate to be named later against Bush. Even though they pulled off the NJ switch? I thought I read in the same survey that when any current dem candidate was named, Bush would defeat them but I can't find it. I think it's time for conservative democrats to come to the rescue of the two party system. Steve

To: SilentZ who wrote (163076)	3/6/2003 3:39:43 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1572515

Not what I expected, at all... Bush is taking a strong leadership role in an unpopular war. This is precisely the reason you can't run the country on polls like the predecessor administration. Sometimes, strong leaders have to take unpopular positions. Whenever I point this out to someone, I try to always suggest they read (or re-read, as the case may be) "Profiles in Courage", the authoritative treatise on strong leaders and unpopular issues.