Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (163251)	3/7/2003 2:06:08 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573092

>Be honest. Had it been up to you liberals, we would have never kicked Saddam out of Kuwait in the first place. Even John Kerry, AS' idol, voted against Desert Storm in 1991. Well, you're exaggerating a bit- I definitely take issue with Kerry for that, but he is in fact pretty far left on the scale, and was even moreso twelve years ago. Most Dems did back the President then. -Z

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (163251)	3/7/2003 7:21:41 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1573092

Ted, <Bush Sr. screwed up.> Be honest. Had it been up to you liberals, we would have never kicked Saddam out of Kuwait in the first place. Even John Kerry, AS' idol, voted against Desert Storm in 1991. I can't agree with you on that one. Clinton would have gone after Saddam. When Dems say Bush Sr. screwed up in 1991, they pretend that they were all for Desert Storm back then. Same thing will happen 12 years from now with regard to Iraq War II. Even the phrase "It's the economy, stupid!" lost its luster after 9/11. Whether dems would have gone after Saddam or not is irrevelant when it comes to evaluating Bush Sr.'s performance. I can live with all of what he did wrong except his leaving Saddam in power. Look at the cost to us today of that mistake. ted