Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (368896)	3/9/2003 6:24:38 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769670

Right. It was Israel.

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (368896)	3/9/2003 6:25:28 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 769670

Sidney, re:It wasn't Bush who prevented Iraq from getting nuclear weapons. It was Israel. Thanks to France for Iraq's nuclear program. They can veto 'til hell freezes over, I don't care. Steve

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (368896)	3/9/2003 6:31:05 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

Your entire post is basically retarded analysis and retarded conclusions in the analysis of what I wrote. You have a severe reading comprehension problem. Well before you continue your stupid snit or your snit of stupidity. I used the term Bush Doctrine. The current Bush Doctrine I spoke of was the idea of preemption. Preemption is the concept underlying the current likely war with Iraq. Ireal's attack I consider to be an example of the application of preemption. It is the same underlying idea the makes so clear the need to act in the case of Iraq. In the dialog of posts, I stated the attack by Israel was an application of the current Bush Doctrine. That doctrine is preemption. That was figurative speech. So you confirmed everything I stated and made an ass of yourself because you seem to be in some hissyfit and do not think very clearly. ROTFLOL.....