Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : My House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (5793)	3/10/2003 5:03:42 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7689

How do we put teeth into enforcement when the only teeth that Saddam seems to cooperate with is the overt threat of military force. Even after he helped himself to Kuwait and we built up our troops over there, he refused to leave until we attacked. Should we still be talking about that with him, or was the ouster the right thing to do? And was it only the right thing to do because he crossed a border, as opposed to violating an agreement not to make terrible weapons? Are we to always wait until he attacks before doing anything? If we are, then disarmament is pointless, and preparing for the next war is the only logical course of action.