Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fred Levine who wrote (68492)	3/11/2003 3:29:59 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

That is why the US wanted full compliance with the '91 resolutions Iraq has never been given anything but a vague goal with shifting rules such as "no evidence is evidence of wrongdoing" and such nonsense. All the U.N. is asking for is a realistic attempt at disarmament which will end in either a lifting of the sanctions or a war. A realistic amount of time should be involved, not just the endless week by week delays. There was never the possibility of anything but war in the strident statements out of Washington, the goal and test were always already failed, yesterday, or twelve years ago.