SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (164033)3/12/2003 10:35:50 AM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573924
 
>Assume for the moment I agree that civil disobedience against the state and secession ARE acts of treason. It does not follow that flying the Confederate flag is an act of treason.

It definitely could.

-Z



To: i-node who wrote (164033)3/12/2003 11:21:10 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573924
 
The Confederate flag stands for civil disobedience against the state, and secession. Are those not treasonous acts?

Assume for the moment I agree that civil disobedience against the state and secession ARE acts of treason. It does not follow that flying the Confederate flag is an act of treason.


Actually, I don't care much but I may buy a Confederate flag and burn it on the streets as an act of something.....I am not sure what! Just kidding!

Seriously, where do you think the UN goes from here? Its sounding like they may be agreeing to issue an ultimatum to Saddam......go on Iraqi tv and admit your hiding weapons and say where they are, and we will will not depose you. If the Sec. Council agrees to that ultimatum, do you think it will chill Bush and satisfy his moral obligation to see the right thing done?

TIA.

ted