Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (20327)	3/13/2003 12:08:41 PM
From: bwanadon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Wrong. Starts from false premise because the war never ended (a truce negotiated predicated on Iraq coming clean in 45 days...now some 12 years past). We are not starting a war, we are finishing it.

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (20327)	3/13/2003 12:30:43 PM
From: tsigprofit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

good post. I think he has a point. It all depends on how this plays out. Mass civilian Iraqi casualties, caused by the US, would in my mind, be cause for pursual of war crimes charges (I am talking about the killing of thousands of Iraqi's - if that happens...) Tony Blair could be removed under a case like this. I wonder how much damage would have to happen before Congress would consider starting the removal process of Bush? And - who would replace him - Cheney? (I'd keep Bush vs. Cheney..) I hope that Saddam will step down, or that there will be mass Iraqi surrenders.